- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:54:47 +1000
- To: Charles McCathie-Neville <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: Public TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
FWIW -- I think obsoleting CC/PP, P3P and the PICS suite of specifications is entirely appropriate; they were good efforts, but didn't meet their goals. The TAG might want to consider doing some research and creating guidelines / doing evangelisation regarding P3P, since a lot of sites still send a P3P header (wasting bits, and often lying in the process). No opinion about the other specs. Cheers, > On 26 Apr 2017, at 12:32 pm, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > > Dear TAG, > > given the new W3C Process document includes an ability to note that documents are OBSOLETE, would you please consider the following documents for obsoletion: > > ATAG 1.0 - made obsolete by ATAG 2.0 > CC/PP > MathML 1 and 2 - there is a version 3 > PICS, PICS Rules, PICS Rating systems, PICS Label distribution > POWDER > P3P > WebCGM 1.0 and 2.0 - there is a version 2.1 > > None of them, as far as I know, have a current Working Group to which I can make the request. > > cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - standards - Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2017 02:55:22 UTC