On Tue, 31 May 2016, at 10:04, Harry Halpin wrote:
> I do not know anyone from the cryptographic or security community that
> would support keeping <keygen>. Indeed, the default response from the
> security/crypto community would be to drop <keygen> due to legacy
> usage of MD5 and violation of security boundaries (SOP).
That would also be my response if I was employed by the NSA and wanted
to prevent technologies that allow user controlled strong cryptography
and decentralized networks of trust (as enabled by webId).
Cheers,
Reto