Re: Minutes from Today's Call

Hi Noah,

The section heading does link to it; maybe that's a bit non-obvious...

Cheers,


> On 1 Mar 2015, at 5:11 am, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote:
> 
> I was just reading the minutes. Overall they're very helpful and well done IMO and seem to capture the discussion sufficiently for non-attendees to follow. However, when there is discussion of things like a draft "mailing list code of conduct" document, it would be very helpful to have a link to the draft being discussed.
> 
> <former chair hat on>
> Regarding obligation of TAG members to respond to all discussion on the mailing lists: I don't think it's practical to impose such an obligation on a group like the TAG. The TAG is 9 people, and the potential traffic on the mailing list is effectively unbounded. Responding to all emails, even from very concerned correspondents, is only sometimes (though often) the best use of time IMO.
> 
> TAG members are chosen (should be chosen) by the community primarily because their judgements' are respected. Trusting TAG members to make reasonable decisions on when to respond explicitly and when not seems to be sensible. We trust them with many more difficult matters.
> 
> I do think it's reasonable to expect that at every posting to www-tag will be read or at least skimmed by at least one TAG member. I would expect that to happen naturally in most cases, but for a long and difficult discussion the chair(s) might assign a few people to relieve other TAG members of the need to read everything.
> <hat off>
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> NOha
> 
> On 2/26/2015 4:19 PM, Daniel Appelquist wrote:
>> Please find the minutes from today’s call posted here:
>> 
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2015/telcons/02-26-houdini-minutes.md
>> 
>> (Feel free to make pull requests if you see errors.)
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Sunday, 1 March 2015 02:39:53 UTC