Yves Lafon wrote: > > Eric J. Bowman wrote: > > > > > My point entirely. Eliminating caching in the name of security, > > particularly if the result isn't secure, amounts to throwing the > > baby out with the bathwater. It's a cop-out by the very insitutions > > folks rely on to solve problems, not come up with cop-outs, > > regardless of how marketable such cop-outs are to the gullible. > > It depends what "security" means here. Pervasive monitoring (aka > sniffing), that should be resolved on a hop-by-hop encryption, or > MiTM that requires end-to-end encryption. > Crap. I meant privacy, there. Sorry 'bout that, folks. -EricReceived on Friday, 9 January 2015 00:38:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:09 UTC