W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [apps-discuss] [arcmedia] Proposed charter for arcmedia

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:55:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa8v555Fi6HE9i036KhubO8aVD241q8cjRSz_DBmK+LPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "arcmedia@ietf.org" <arcmedia@ietf.org>, Public TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> wrote:

>
> Please also put ISO 9660 in the charter, however--or if people don't like
>> ISO 9660, some other archive format that is unquestionably a disk image.
>> (TARs can be disk images, as they can store inode block info. But they are
>> not generally thought of primarily in that way.)
>>
>
>  Can you propose a specific text change?  I'm having trouble seeing how
> this would improve the charter given the only specific references we have
> in there now are examples, and more of those won't change much...
>
>
> Here's a diff, and the changed text.
> (Not sure if it will be accepted by the IETF mailing list...guess we're
> about to find out
>

I'm fine with the second change, but I don't understand why we need the
first.  All it does (as far as I can tell) is make the example list longer.

-MSK
Received on Saturday, 3 January 2015 18:55:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:09 UTC