W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2015

Re: FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:17:05 +0000
Message-ID: <54A51EA1.8090900@ninebynine.org>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, arcmedia@ietf.org
On 01/01/2015 00:02, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Happy new year...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Masinter
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 4:01 PM
> To: 'Graham Klyne'; Murray S. Kucherawy; Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Cc: arcmedia@ietf.org; IETF Apps Discuss
> Subject: RE: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
>
> I think the arcmedia WG charter should take into the W3C TAG work on packaging/archives
>
> http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/

Agreed.  But noting that there could be some differences in emphasis, as that 
format is not intended to be an *archive* format.   Which I guess begs a 
question here: should the charter focus to be on *archive* or more broadly on 
multiple-file packaging formats?  (I'm not sure what difference that would make 
in practice, but I have a feeling some archival specialists might have something 
to add about this.)  I lean to the latter, but "archive format" is a more 
concise description.

In particular, if suggesting a common fragment identifier format, I think the 
specification in the W3C document could be useful to consider for adoption.

#g
--

>
> (W3c-tag bcc)
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: apps-discuss [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Graham Klyne
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:00 AM
>> To: Murray S. Kucherawy; Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> Cc: arcmedia@ietf.org; IETF Apps Discuss
>> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
>>
>> Re:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/current/msg00001.html
>>
>> I think the suggested charter looks pretty good.  The work seems
>> well-scoped to me.
>>
>> I'd expect to review at least the proposed base document, and maybe
>> some of the initial registrations.
>>
>> #g
>> --
>>
>>
>> On 30/12/2014 18:13, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
>>> soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi - what's the status of the chartering of the arcmedia WG? I
>>>> don't see that it has been added to http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/
>>>> and there is no further emails on the arcmedia mailing list.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A mailing list was created shortly after the November meeting, and
>>> the proposed charter was posted there and here.  There has been no
>>> response of any kind.
>>>
>>> -MSK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> apps-discuss mailing list
>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 January 2015 10:17:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:09 UTC