Re: Security, Privacy, and Accessibility self-review Questionnaires.

24.11.2014, 12:51, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>:
>>  On 24 Nov 2014, at 8:46 pm, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>  On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>>  My first inclination would be to put it as a wiki page on the TAG spec-reviews repo <https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews> and evolve it there.
>>  I don't think the Wiki is enabled on that repo.
>
> Let me fix that for you... There.
>>  And, selfishly, I'd prefer to use vim to edit the document. :)

I'm not that concerned about what editor you like, but I am quite fond of HTML as a format :S

>>  It's not really clear what, if any, process is going to spring up around this topic. So, for the moment:
>>>  I do think something informal / easy to interact with is nice (let's face it, even in a living-standard model, it's hard to beat a wiki).
>>  I'm fine with informal and easy, but I'd like there to be a path to some document with a stamp on it that people who care about such stamps can look at, evaluate, and say "Yes. This document has a stamp, so I will carefully consider its contents."
>>
>>  For better or worse, Wiki pages are rarely taken seriously by the sorts of folks who care about stamps.
>
> Sure, but the audience here AIUI is reviewers that we point at documents, not the document authors themselves.
>
> If authors wilfully ignore / go against friendly, helpful review advice, that's kind of their own problem once the "real" process kicks in...

Right. And if we get something we think is worth publishing more formally, we might be ready to think about how to publish it. It isn't clear that we are working toward that yet…

cheers

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 23:37:22 UTC