On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > My first inclination would be to put it as a wiki page on the TAG > spec-reviews repo <https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews> and evolve it > there. > I don't think the Wiki is enabled on that repo. And, selfishly, I'd prefer to use vim to edit the document. :) Perhaps we could stick a Markdown file in a "draft guidelines" subdirectory? > YMMV -- especially if these reviews are going to be driven from another > place. > It's not really clear what, if any, process is going to spring up around this topic. So, for the moment: > I do think something informal / easy to interact with is nice (let's face > it, even in a living-standard model, it's hard to beat a wiki). > I'm fine with informal and easy, but I'd like there to be a path to some document with a stamp on it that people who care about such stamps can look at, evaluate, and say "Yes. This document has a stamp, so I will carefully consider its contents." For better or worse, Wiki pages are rarely taken seriously by the sorts of folks who care about stamps. -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 09:46:49 UTC