- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:01:16 +0100
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>
* Alex Russell wrote: >>From last week's meeting, it seems reasonable for us to consider the case >of binary UTF-8 JSON data being exposed as API: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2014Mar/0116.html > >To my design-nose, this smells. Thoughts? The mail seems like a complaint about `importKey` expecting binary data as parameter while, apparently, having that data as JS object or as JSON text string is also common, and a proposal to make `importKey` accept a JS object in addition to binary data. Your issue is with which part of that, exactly? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 17:01:49 UTC