Re: Some comments on the draft TAG EME paper from Henri Sivonen on 2014-03-04 (www-tag@w3.org from March 2014)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:33:46 +0200
To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Cc: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CANXqsRLs=u3g_pPF-nZzfgQi2YyqJWsb=1viv1vdF9yFNFUaeg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi> wrote:
> If they are able to
> deliver sufficient obscurity with those instruction set targets, I
> don't see a technical reason why they couldn't deliver sufficient
> obscurity using asm.js as the instruction set

...except asm.js is different when it comes to jump instructions.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@hsivonen.fi
https://hsivonen.fi/

Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 12:34:14 UTC