- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:59:00 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > > * That leads pretty naturally to a discussion of the priority of > constituencies, as defined by HTML5 > <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies> > -- it'd be interesting to apply here and maybe make it a wider > discussion among the W3C (we've already started putting our foot into > this water in the IETF: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-stakeholder-rights-00>). > -1 Priority rights would be more interesting if actually followed. From where I sit, though, the problem with HTML5 and HTTP2 is the primary stakeholder is really browser vendors. I lost track of how many discussions ended with "browsers will/won't implement that" but that's really the essence of my problem with the process -- tail wags dog. How about we don't pay disingenuous lip-service to users and authors, with yet more documentation nobody follows when designing specs suited to browser vendors uber alles? -Eric
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 21:59:41 UTC