- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:11:48 -0500 (EST)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 12/10/2014 12:31 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: >> From: Melvin Carvalho [mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com] >> >>> Firstly, HTTP isnt always insecure, it can be, but is not always >> >> HTTP is always insecure by definition. The insecure transport is not >> always being *attacked*, but you have literally no way of knowing >> whether you're being attacked or not, so for all practical purposes >> you must always assume an attack. > > I'll make an assertion, an observation, and a recommendation. > > I'll assert that 'http://localhost:8088/' is secure. More precisely, if that > can't be secured, then one needs to give up all hope. I'd suggest that a web > server on a camera connected via USB to a desktop is another such scenario. I agree for localhost (if running on a privileged port), but for USB, anything you plug is by definition insecure. See <http://travisgoodspeed.blogspot.fr/2012/10/emulating-usb-dfu-to-capture-firmware.html> for example. -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiƩu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 16:11:49 UTC