- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:49:10 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- CC: "semantic-web@w3.org >> \"semantic-web@w3.org\"" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <53FDE1D6.2010407@openlinksw.com>
On 8/27/14 6:47 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > On 23/08/2014 01:47, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> The first thing that comes to mind is HSTS - >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security >> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6797 >> >> … which basically allows a client to securely discover when they >> should stop using http:// for a given hostname. >> >> IIRC the general feeling on the sort of approach you outline is that >> the horse has already bolted; we can’t make blanket, retroactive >> changes to the entire Web. > > Rather than retroactive change, could something like this work?: > > C: GET http:example.com/example HTTP/x.x > > S: xxx ... (2xx or 3xx) > S: : > S: Link: https:example.com/example; rel=owl:sameas > > (I know the syntax isn't right, but I hope you get the idea.) > > #g > -- +1 Being explicit about the relations that connect the entities denotes by HTTP URIs is really the best long term approach. Link: https:example.com/example; rel="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs" . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2014 13:49:37 UTC