Larry Masinter,
I take strong issue with your accusation and the gross misconduct of the W3C Technical Architecture Group.
From: Larry Masinter
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:33 AM
To: Daniel Appelquist, www-tag@w3.org
I'd suggested a candidate panel discussion or Q&A, but the question was "where?".
'www-tag' might not be the best venue, but it's probably more relevant than the Sobieski hoax.
(for which you should consider
http://www.cmu.edu/research-compliance/report-problem/index.html).
Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Appelquist [mailto:appelquist@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:02 PM
> To: TAG List
> Subject: Status Updates
>
> This week I am working on getting the URL spec publishing pipeline
> working. Robin has been good enough to set it up - now I just need to
> figure out how it works such that we can publish a fpwd.
>
> I am going to open up general registration for the extensible web
> summit Berlin tomorrow and will publicise accordingly from @w3ctag
> and on the blog.
>
> Election-wise, I am trying to get the candidacy statements made public
> and I will publish a blog post when that happens.
>
> I have asked Philippe to help set up what needs to be set up for the
> promises guide. Domenic, expect a contact.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan