- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:47:43 +0000
- To: "'Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com'" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "'annevk@annevk.nl'" <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: "'w3c@marcosc.com'" <w3c@marcosc.com>, "'daniel.appelquist@telefonica.com'" <daniel.appelquist@telefonica.com>, "'domenic@domenicdenicola.com'" <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "'steve@steveklabnik.com'" <steve@steveklabnik.com>, "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>
Heresy! A tweet is not the best way to communicate? How old-school a thought! Maybe next time it can be broadcast on IRC too. -----Original Message----- From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:29 PM To: annevk@annevk.nl Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; w3c@marcosc.com; daniel.appelquist@telefonica.com; domenic@domenicdenicola.com; steve@steveklabnik.com; www-tag@w3.org Subject: Re: TAG Blog Post on Feedback from Extensible Web Summit Thanks Anne, obviously I missed or ignored that one - a tweet is not the best anyway, given the number of tweets that come through. was there an announcement on the TAG list or elsewhere in W3C? (I might have missed this being occupied with other things.) regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Apr 17, 2014, at 3:18 PM, ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:58 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: >> I didn't see anything until a tweet from Robin afterwards. A W3C tweet in advance with a link to a web page with information would have been helpful as well as a W3C email to relevant WGs etc . > > https://twitter.com/w3ctag/status/444611935519395840 was retweeted by @w3c... > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 19:48:40 UTC