- From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:09:57 +0100
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- CC: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 10/04/2014 23:44, Alex Russell wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:04 PM, ashok malhotra > <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>wrote: > >> Hi Jeni: >> A couple of quick comments: >> >> 1. MHTML is a packaging format. Why is it not suitable? Need to say >> something about it. >> > > There's no standard for it, AFAICT. > Not so: - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2387 Strictly, this isn't MHTML, but the underlying packaging format used by MHTML (multipart/related). MHTML itself is defined in: - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2557 These are both IETF standards-track documents. (Though, to be fair, Jeni did give reasons for not using a multipart type.) #g --
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 07:11:40 UTC