- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:28:18 +1100
- To: TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
FYI, minor update. This is likely to go to IETF LC soon. Cheers, Begin forwarded message: > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-02.txt > Date: 3 April 2014 3:20:55 pm AEDT > To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-02.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn > Revision: 02 > Title: URI Design and Ownership > Document date: 2014-04-03 > Group: appsawg > Pages: 8 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-02.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn/ > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-02 > Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-02 > > Abstract: > RFC3986 Section 3.1 defines URI syntax as "a federated and extensible > naming system my further restrict the syntax and semantics of > identifiers using that scheme." In other words, the structure of a > URI is defined by its scheme. While it is common for schemes to > further delegate their substructure to the URI's owner, publishing > standards that mandate particular forms of URI substructure is > inappropriate, because the effectively usurps ownership. > > This document is intended to prevent this practice (sometimes called > "URI Squatting") in standards, but updating RFC3986 to indicate where > it is acceptable. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2014 04:28:33 UTC