Re: References and Modularity

Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> >  
> > Yes, that's what Tim proposed, but I think it is still subject to
> > the caveat that if the Unicode Consortium decided to change what
> > was called a "character", all of the specs that referenced it would
> > need to be changed when they updated the version.
> 
> 
> That's ok. Living Documents give you that ability.  
> 

At the expense of no longer being what most anyone considers to be
what's meant by "spec".  Keep fighting the good fight, Larry...

-Eric