Re: Standardizing on IDNA 2003 in the URL Standard

On 22/08/13 13:17, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> 2 as deployed is not stuck on an archaic Unicode version. 3 might be
> interesting, depending on what variant is chosen. E.g. Gerv has been
> suggesting that we in Gecko should implement a different variety from
> Internet Explorer... (I'm not a fan.)

You mean with regard to UseSTD3ASCIIRules? Happy to change my proposal
in that regard. See the bug.

Gerv

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 12:29:10 UTC