Saturday, 30 June 2012
- RE: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
 - Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
 - Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
 - Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
 
Friday, 29 June 2012
- Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
 - "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
 - ISSUE-63 and recent work on provenance
 - ACTION-727
 - publishing and linking
 
Thursday, 28 June 2012
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 
Monday, 25 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 
Sunday, 24 June 2012
- RE: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 
Saturday, 23 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 
Friday, 22 June 2012
- RE: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 
Thursday, 21 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Thursday, 21 June 2012
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: US Congressmen send letter on Do Not Track to W3C
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
 - US Congressmen send letter on Do Not Track to W3C
 - Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
 - Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
 
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
- Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
 - Re: Early heads-up on agenda and scribing for this week's TAG telcon
 - Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
 - Agenda for TAG teleconference of 21 June 2012
 - Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
 - Draft minutes of Wed 13th June 2012 TAG F2F
 
Monday, 18 June 2012
Thursday, 14 June 2012
- Fwd: The enc: URL scheme
 - Re: What would count as good measurements wrt the utility of SPDY?
 - Meteor: server/client code/data synchronisation
 
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - What would count as good measurements wrt the utility of SPDY?
 - Re: 2004 update to TAG charter
 - 2004 update to TAG charter
 - Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
 - SPDY benchmarking
 - Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
 - Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
 
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
- XML-ER thoughts for input to TAG f2f discussion tomorrow
 - Text for Metaformats W3C page
 - Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
 - Re: acct: scheme thread
 - acct: scheme thread
 - Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
 - RE: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 
Monday, 11 June 2012
- Re: W3C TAG to review draft on Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions
 - W3C TAG to review draft on Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions
 - Fwd: Re: App Cache
 - Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 
Saturday, 9 June 2012
- Agenda for TAG F2F of 12-14 June 2012
 - Net Neutrality & Web Content providers installing servers at ISPs
 
Friday, 8 June 2012
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - RE: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - Client-side storage
 - Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - Patterns and pitfalls in storage synchronisation
 - ni: URI scheme in last call
 
Thursday, 7 June 2012
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
- Re: revised "URI documentation discovery" product page
 - revised "URI documentation discovery" product page
 - TAG call of 7 June is cancelled
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
- Firefox 13 ships with SPDY enabled by default
 - RE: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - Work-in-progress agenda and required reading for TAG F2F
 - additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
 - ACTION-647: Robin to draft updated product page/plan for TAG work on storage
 
Monday, 4 June 2012
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
 - Re: ACTION-478: Persistence of references...discuss at F2F
 - ACTION-478: Persistence of references...discuss at F2F
 - ACTION-711: CSS vendor prefix session at TAG F2F
 - Re: Misunderstanding documentation protocols
 - Re: ACTION-694: Introduction to http+aes scheme discussion