Saturday, 30 June 2012
- RE: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
- Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
- Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
- Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
Friday, 29 June 2012
- Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
- "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries
- ISSUE-63 and recent work on provenance
- ACTION-727
- publishing and linking
Thursday, 28 June 2012
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
Monday, 25 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
Sunday, 24 June 2012
- RE: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
Saturday, 23 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
Friday, 22 June 2012
- RE: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
Thursday, 21 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Thursday, 21 June 2012
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: US Congressmen send letter on Do Not Track to W3C
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Re: Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- Registration of acct: as a URI scheme has been requested
- US Congressmen send letter on Do Not Track to W3C
- Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
- Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
- Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
- Re: Early heads-up on agenda and scribing for this week's TAG telcon
- Re: Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
- Agenda for TAG teleconference of 21 June 2012
- Publishing and Linking - Some thoughts for Thursday
- Draft minutes of Wed 13th June 2012 TAG F2F
Monday, 18 June 2012
Thursday, 14 June 2012
- Fwd: The enc: URL scheme
- Re: What would count as good measurements wrt the utility of SPDY?
- Meteor: server/client code/data synchronisation
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- What would count as good measurements wrt the utility of SPDY?
- Re: 2004 update to TAG charter
- 2004 update to TAG charter
- Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
- SPDY benchmarking
- Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
- Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
- XML-ER thoughts for input to TAG f2f discussion tomorrow
- Text for Metaformats W3C page
- Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
- Re: acct: scheme thread
- acct: scheme thread
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- Re: Text for Metaformats W3C page
- RE: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
Monday, 11 June 2012
- Re: W3C TAG to review draft on Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions
- W3C TAG to review draft on Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions
- Fwd: Re: App Cache
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
Saturday, 9 June 2012
- Agenda for TAG F2F of 12-14 June 2012
- Net Neutrality & Web Content providers installing servers at ISPs
Friday, 8 June 2012
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- RE: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- Client-side storage
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- Patterns and pitfalls in storage synchronisation
- ni: URI scheme in last call
Thursday, 7 June 2012
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
- Re: revised "URI documentation discovery" product page
- revised "URI documentation discovery" product page
- TAG call of 7 June is cancelled
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
- Firefox 13 ships with SPDY enabled by default
- RE: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- Work-in-progress agenda and required reading for TAG F2F
- additional issue-57 use case: polysemy
- ACTION-647: Robin to draft updated product page/plan for TAG work on storage
Monday, 4 June 2012
- Re: Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- Question from IETF's Interenet Architecture Board (IAB) web apps, native apps, web-based apps
- Re: ACTION-478: Persistence of references...discuss at F2F
- ACTION-478: Persistence of references...discuss at F2F
- ACTION-711: CSS vendor prefix session at TAG F2F
- Re: Misunderstanding documentation protocols
- Re: ACTION-694: Introduction to http+aes scheme discussion