Re: FYI, tag election links

On 16 December 2012 22:35, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote:

> Larry:
> See inline...
> All the best, Ashok
>
>
> On 12/16/2012 12:25 PM, Larry Masinter wrote:
>
>> I've been looking without success for the table of contents we drafted,
>> It would be great to (re)start a discussion about an AWWW update.
>>
> Here is a suggestion from Kingsley for volume 2 of AWWW:
>
>
> 1. Web Application Architecture
> 2. Web Application Interactions
> 3. Web Data Representation, Access, Integration, and Exchange
> 4. Web Identity & Privacy
> 5. Web Resource Access Controls.
>
> We can quibble with these and add or elaborate others but he is in the
> right ballpark.


+1


>
>
>
>> I've done a bit of "TAG History" mining -- I didn't actually invent the
>> TAG, despite http://masinter.blogspot.com/**2012/12/i-invented-w3c-tag.**
>> html <http://masinter.blogspot.com/2012/12/i-invented-w3c-tag.html> /
>>
>> It's useful to look at the discussions around what people expected from
>> the TAG.
>>
>> Concrete question for www-tag@w3.org
>>
>> There are two TAG FPWDs now:
>>
>>     http://www.w3.org/TR/**publishing-linking/<http://www.w3.org/TR/publishing-linking/>
>>     http://www.w3.org/TR/fragid-**best-practices/<http://www.w3.org/TR/fragid-best-practices/>
>>
>> For each of these: is this part of something it is important for the TAG
>>  to work on?
>> Whether Yes or No, what are your reasons for saying so?
>>
>> I think the former is an example of TAG work in governance, and the
>> latter an example of liaison with IETF, both of which I think should be TAG
>> priorities;
>> do you agree?
>>
> The work on these documents is done.  We should publish them and move on.
>
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>