- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:48:53 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50CB3C55.8040601@openlinksw.com>
On 12/14/12 8:22 AM, Harry Halpin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Ashok Malhotra > <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote: > > Add Vol 2 dealing with Application Architecture? > > > I strongly support Volume 2 being about Web application architecture. > Its a fast-moving space, and relating it to HTML and documents is > necessary, lest parts of the WebArch stack get left behind (which I > worry may happen to the SemWeb, for example). Volume 1 also has lots > of value, although it definitely could use some tweaks as well to > bring it up to date. Perhaps that could happen simulatenously with > applications in Volume 2, and then the documents could be clearly (and > realistically) related. > > To make the point, Web browsers are now effectively Javascript virtual > machines, with crossplatform interop being defined by the W3C and > ECMA. Thus, its better to think of the Web as replacing Java (where > interop was defined by SUN, and now Oracle), and thus a web of apps > rather than as a web of documents. Explaining this transition and > stating its new architectural requirements, including acknowledging > the security and privacy issues (esp. cookies) is of *utmost* importance. > > All this talk of declative vs. functional reminds me of teaching > Haskell to undergrads at Uni. of Edinburgh. Some would get very > excited and then proceed to stop using other programming languages, > calling them inferior - until they had to get a job, that is :) There > is of course a movement towards functional features in languages > across the board, and Javascript has many nice functional > capabilities, such as first-class functions, and designing APIs with > better async is now happening, i.e. "promises". Yet developing and > using these APIs still a black art for many WGs and developers, so > guidance is definitely necessary in this space. Harry, So we have something along the following lines: 1. Programmable Web of Apps -- for the JS virtual machine 2. Actionable Web of Intentions -- for Web Intents 3. Web of Linked Data -- for Linked Data and Semantic Web. Methinks, each of the above is the basis for specialization volumes derived from the existing core AWWW volumes. Kingsley > > cheers, > harry > > All the best, Ashok > > > On 12/13/2012 5:16 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > On 12/13/12 11:33 AM, Ashok Malhotra wrote: > > AWWW is outdated and should be revised or withdrawn. > All the best, Ashok > > > - 1 for withdrawal. > > +1 for tweaks that have more to do with clarification than > anything else. > > AWWW is a solid piece of work, don't mess with it :-) > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 14:49:18 UTC