- From: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:51:46 -0700
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Dec 13, 2012, at 18:16, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 12/13/12 11:33 AM, Ashok Malhotra wrote: >> AWWW is outdated and should be revised or withdrawn. >> All the best, Ashok > > - 1 for withdrawal. > > +1 for tweaks that have more to do with clarification than anything else. > > AWWW is a solid piece of work, don't mess with it :-) Thanks so much for this, Kingsley. We have used AWWW as our architectural compass in various efforts over the past few years: OAI-ORE, Memento, Open Annotation. One can't just pull the plug on architectural concepts that are so fundamental as those described in AWWW. Update and clarify, yes. But withdraw, absolutely not. Herbert Van de Sompel > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > >
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 03:52:16 UTC