- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:54:10 +0100
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Norm Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
FYI, I have now filed 4 bugs against Polyglot Markup, to address some
of the issues that the XML/HTML TF discussed:
A) Formally define polyglotâs relationship to HTML5
("applicable spec")
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20197
B) Formally define that polyglot can be extended
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20198
C) HTML parser in toolchain vs polyglot:
Say that such an HTML parser may produce polyglots
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20199
D) polyglot markup and extensions via <script> (and <style>)
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20201
Leif Halvard Silli
Noah Mendelsohn, Sat, 01 Dec 2012 15:57:03 -0500:
>
> On 12/1/2012 3:50 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Probably that line of thought should also be applied to Henri's
>> arguments since he only, this laid expressed that he wanted the said
>> consequences to be drawn from the report.
>
> I'm sure we'll try and do our best to come to whatever is the best
> conclusion for the community, independent of when people's opinions
> were expressed. I was only pointing out that there are some
> challenges in trying to do in 2 weeks a careful reconsideration of
> conclusions that were reached over many months, and with the benefit
> of substantial review and input at the time. We'll do our best.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Noah
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 06:55:50 UTC