Re: ACTION-687: Please help me remember what this one is about

On 2012-04-25 22:56, Robin Berjon wrote:
> ...
>> Further more>if<  the reference is to an IETF document for which the link will go 404 after the document expires, then I don't think that would be particularly defensible in a REC (not sure that's the case here, but links from a rec should be to documents that will, with high probability, remain accessible far into the future, IMO.)
>
> If IETF does indeed mint uncool URIs it's certainly a problem, but I would expect that problem to be taken to the IETF. As things stand though, the draft has expired but the link still works.
> ...

The spec uses a URI on tools.ietf.org, which is *not* the official IETF 
URI for an internet draft.

> ...

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 05:51:44 UTC