W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2012

Re: ACTION-687: Please help me remember what this one is about

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:51:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4F98E24E.8080503@gmx.de>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@W3.org>
On 2012-04-25 22:56, Robin Berjon wrote:
> ...
>> Further more>if<  the reference is to an IETF document for which the link will go 404 after the document expires, then I don't think that would be particularly defensible in a REC (not sure that's the case here, but links from a rec should be to documents that will, with high probability, remain accessible far into the future, IMO.)
>
> If IETF does indeed mint uncool URIs it's certainly a problem, but I would expect that problem to be taken to the IETF. As things stand though, the draft has expired but the link still works.
> ...

The spec uses a URI on tools.ietf.org, which is *not* the official IETF 
URI for an internet draft.

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 05:51:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:44 UTC