- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:18:28 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F986A24.3030801@openlinksw.com>
On 4/25/12 3:16 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > Hi all, > > this has been going around Twitter so I suppose many of you have seen it already. But for those who haven't, there appears to be yet another grassroots TAG group (it seems to be the popular thing to do nowadays!) called the "Fake TAG" (not sure if it's a reference to something). It looks like they want to take on issues on our list. > > They've set the bar very high right out of the gate by immediately solving httpRange-14. I can't say that I dislike the resolution: > > http://faketag.org/a-101-on-the-range-of-the-http-dereference-function/ > > The site doesn't feature a copyright statement — maybe we should ask, I think we could just reuse this :) > FWIW -- the post delivers content, that when translated, is just as broken as the narrative it attempts to ridicule. Luckily for the world, computer science has long cracked what's become a bizarre imbroglio within a tiny enclave. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 21:18:52 UTC