- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:45:08 +0200
- To: Tony Hansen <tony@maillennium.att.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
* Tony Hansen wrote: >So I've added these Fragment identifier considerations sections to the >suffixes that have an underlying media type registration. > > Media types using "+json" MUST accept any fragment identifiers > defined for "application/json". Specific media types may > identify additional fragment identifier considerations. This says that "+json" cannot be used for JSON types where fragment identifiers are of any concern since any future specification of the application/json type may override such registrations in incompatible ways. This seems to be missing the point of why we would have "+json" to begin with. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 19:45:38 UTC