- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 12:21:07 -0700
- To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
It might be more useful to focus on the IRI processing spec than patching the text in HTML that should be removed. -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 1:51 AM To: Jeni Tennison Cc: www-tag@w3.org List Subject: Re: URL/URI/IRI resolution in HTML5/RDF/RDFa On 2011-11-03 19:44, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-11-03 19:22, Jeni Tennison wrote: >> Julian, >> >> (I wasn't ignoring what you wrote, just wanted to check it out, hence >> the delay :) >> >> On 2 Nov 2011, at 15:11, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> 2) "\" and "/": >>> >>> 2a) The uniform treatment of "\" hasn't agreement; for instance, >>> Firefox does it only for file URIs (as far as I recall). >>> >>> 2b) That being said, "\" doesn't appear in syntactically valid URIs >>> or IRIs anyway, so maybe we can ignore the question; it won't affect >>> any valid URI/IRI anyway. >> >> >> That being the case, how would any URL that contained a "\" get to >> step 12 of the HTML5 resolution algorithm [1] where they're swapped >> for "/"s given that step 10 says (I think!) that syntactically >> invalid URI/IRIs will raise an error and stop the resolution? >> ... > > That appears to be a bug (or a feature, depending on p.o.v.). > ... Raised as <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14693>. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 19:21:53 UTC