- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:10:14 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Reviewing the minutes of the TAG's 17 March 2011 call I note [1]: LM: I feel pretty strongly that we need to take this through broader review, by putting it on the REC track... so it gets community review ...followed by discussion that seemed generally sympathetic with that approach. Investing in rec track work is a fairly serious commitment for the TAG, and the minutes don't quite capture whether there was formal consensus to do that. I personally have no problem at all doing this as rec-track, but my concern is that, for the moment, we have nobody committed to pulling something together in that form, and no actions assigned that will cause me to remember to push us in that direction. So, I worry that this will fall through the cracks. I do see ACTION-541 [2], which is fine as a next step, but if we're serious about doing this as rec-track, we either need someone to take an action to prepare a FPWD (possibly in steps leading to that), or at very least, someone to draft a TAG product page, scoping the effort, clarifying success criteria, and clearly indicating that rec-track is the intended path. Is anyone willing to step up to doing either of those? If you want to try a product page, rough examples can be found using CVS in the directory [3] (W3C Team can access the directory through the Web -- other TAG members will have to use CVS due to access controls). Thank you. Noah [1] file:///C:/Noah/Web/TAG/CVS/WWW/2001/tag/2011/03/17-minutes#item04 [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/541 [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 15:10:46 UTC