- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:44:43 +0000
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Ashok, On 9 Mar 2011, at 21:59, ashok malhotra wrote: > On 3/9/2011 12:37 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote: >> What we see with hash(-bang) URIs is that web developers are starting to structure them to look like paths or query strings rather than using the traditional "local name" (id) -- they are encoding the same information, but putting it in the fragment identifier to get the performance benefits associated with the fact that changes to the fragment don't cause page reloads. > Did you mean #! specifically? I think your observation applies to the use of frag Ids in general. I agree that applies to fragment identifiers in general (in fact the example I gave in my P.S. was a hash URI that illustrated the point). I think it's particularly prevalent when you're looking at the types of web application that use dynamic transclusion, which are the class that will benefit most from using the hash-bang convention. So I suspect there will be a correlation. Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 22:45:13 UTC