- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:24:43 -0500
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Ashok: I also very much want to discuss the points in my posting of last night [1], highlights of which are: * Use a document abstraction in Web apps when you can. * When you do, provide first class URIs that can be emailed, linked, and accessed from non-Javascript clients. * Put more long term emphasis on using "?" vs "#" syntax. For that reason, change the title of the HashInURI draft to something like: "Identification of resources in Web applications", or something else that's neutral with respect to syntactic choices. BTW: I think the first two of these are pretty close to Good Practice Notes I'd advocate putting in your finding. FYI: What I intend to do is schedule for tomorrow discussion specifically of !# (especially Jeni's note) and my posting. Then we'll get back to other issues raised by your draft on a subsequent call. Thanks! Noah [1] http://blog.arcanedomain.com/2011/03/identifying-documents-in-web-applications/ [2] http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/node/154 On 3/9/2011 10:18 AM, ashok malhotra wrote: > Hi Noah: > The latest version of the HashInUri Draft is > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/HashInURI-20110228.html > > When we discuss this we should distinguish two threads of argument > - The use of fragment identifiers to identify, public, reproducible states > in AJAX apps > - The use of the #! convention which was introduced by Google (see > http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/specification.html) to make > such client states crawlable > All the best, Ashok > > On 3/8/2011 8:11 PM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: >> I've posted some thoughts at [1] on the identification of documents in >> Web applications. This relates to the draft Ashok is editing on >> client-side URIs [2](titled: "Repurposing the Hash Sign for the New Web", >> though one of the points in my posting is that we need to look at "?" as >> well as "#", so I'd really like to change that title.) >> >> The posting also relates to the hash-bang #! controversy, and I'll be >> scheduling a discussion of that for Thursday. Please try to read both my >> posting [1] and Jeni's [3] before this week's call. Last I heard from >> Amy, Tim will be joining us. I expect to do the agenda tomorrow morning. >> Thank you. >> >> Noah >> >> [1] >> http://blog.arcanedomain.com/2011/03/identifying-documents-in-web-applications/ >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/HashInURI-20110208 >> [3] http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/node/154 >> >
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 15:25:13 UTC