- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:09:44 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
I'd like to change reference [7] in my proposal. The following one is more informative, and it happens to also be the one that I've used in previous discussions of this topic. (So I just want to replace one message from Harry with another one from him.) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-awwsw/2011Jan/0021.html Best Jonathan On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote: > Proposal: Use ISSUE-57 instead of creating a new issue, but modify its > title to match its description and its origins (Giovanni's email). > > Current title: "The use of HTTP Redirection" > > Change to: "Mechanisms for obtaining information about the intended > meaning of a given URI" > > [I've tried about 20 different versions of this title and > am not happy with any of them. There are several things > wrong with this one. But I see no reason to be > perfectionist about this; we only need an issue title that > doesn't presuppose a particular solution, scheme, or protocol.] > > [If you don't like this wording please let's work on it before > the telcon - working out consensus wording live > will take forever.] > > Append to the description: > > "On its 2011-dd-dd telcon [6] the TAG noted that members of > the community (e.g. in [7]) report that the performance > characteristics and deployment complexity of using 303 > redirects leave them feeling that they have little option but > to use 200 responses for this purpose, at variance with the > TAG's httpRange-14 resolution [8]." > > [6] (TBD) > [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0035.html > [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html > > Also remove Stuart's signature from the description as only some of the > text is attributable to him, even as it stands. (Sorry Stuart.) > > My apologies for bouncing around a bit on this one. I had previously > overlooked ISSUE-57 because of its title. If its title is changed, as > it should be in any case, then I believe this issue > will be an appropriate place to track further work. > > Jonathan > > cf. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57 >
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 15:15:33 UTC