W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2011

Re: [Bug 13100] TAG issue on HTML+RDFa and Microdata last call drafts

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:14:37 +0100
Message-Id: <80E0A9E6-D960-43D0-BC23-48D3652678CC@jenitennison.com>
To: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
FWIW, I think this response is reasonable. We wanted to give the HTML WG a heads up about the formation of the task force, but there isn't anything specific for the editors to do until the W3C puts the task force together and it starts coming out with bug reports.

On the other hand, we do want to ensure that the specs don't become Recommendations before the task force has a chance to do its work. Is there anything that we need to do, process-wise, during Last Call, to prevent that from happening, or can that be prevented at a later stage if it proves necessary? (Noting that we're not anticipating the task force taking very long.)



On 18 Jul 2011, at 22:39, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:

> The TAG needs to decide what, if anything, to do about the attached. Thank you.
> Noah
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:	[Bug 13100] TAG issue on HTML+RDFa and Microdata last call drafts
> Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:41:38 +0000
> From:	bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
> To:	nrm@arcanedomain.com
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13100
> Aryeh Gregor 
> <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com>
>  changed:
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
> --- Comment #11 from Aryeh Gregor 
> <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com>
>  2011-07-18 18:41:37 UTC ---
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: As far as I can tell, nothing described in this bug is specific
> enough to be actionable.  It does not request that any specific changes be made
> to the microdata specification.  If the TAG or any other party would like to
> set up a committee to make recommendations, it is free to do so.  If a
> committee is eventually formed and does develop specific recommendations, it
> can file them as individual bugs like any other feedback.
> -- 
> Configure bugmail: 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.

Jeni Tennison
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 22:15:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:39 UTC