- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:21:09 -0500
- To: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Mozilla seems to have adopted a strategy for archiving Web sites which are "abandoned" [1] * Identify sites that had been abandoned, no longer fit the Mozilla mission, or had serious security or privacy concerns. * Determine a way to retire each site or remedy the expressed concerns. * Ensure that the site’s purpose within the history of the Mozilla mission was preserved. And they created a Mozilla Web site archive [2] # Why do I share this? I have seen different strategies around the Web in my different places of work. * W3C is using a lot the notion of unique identifiers (through a dated space) to make it easier to manage the legacy * Most of Web sites done by Web agencies are at a regular pace completely destroyed and remade new with the same domain name without considering the URI legacy. * Some sites exist for only a couple of years. Think about all these movies Web sites. * And here there is another proposal with Mozilla, which is kind of shelved Web site (aka managing somehow your own http://archive.org/ ) It also reminds me of the recent proposal: HTTP framework for time-based access to resource states -- Memento [3] [1] http://blog.mozilla.com/webdev/2011/01/05/mozilla-website-archive/ [2] http://blog.mozilla.com/website-archive/ [3] http://mementoweb.org/guide/rfc/ID/ -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 21:21:45 UTC