- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:59:18 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Larry, skimming this document, I notice that it's written in relatively strong language — all the way to an RFC 2119 MUST that's supposed to apply to all Working Groups. For a "Best Practices" document, I'd expect a much looser style of language: "It is useful to do this …", "Groups typically do that". Or perhaps the good old imperative: "Best practice: Use IANA registries." I'd suggest to either steer clear of strong normative language, or clarify that the status of the document is actually meant to be normative. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) On 2011-12-07, at 06:27 +0100, Larry Masinter wrote: > I wouldn't mind using call time for even an informal discussion of the attached... > For my (way overdue) action-531. > > <draft-registries.txt>
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 09:59:23 UTC