W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2011

Re: early draft on 'best practices for registries' & Dec 8 call ACTION-531

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:59:18 +0100
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F22B0978-A43E-4251-A530-C86085FD2CD3@w3.org>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>

skimming this document, I notice that it's written in relatively strong language  all the way to an RFC 2119 MUST that's supposed to apply to all Working Groups.

For a "Best Practices" document, I'd expect a much looser style of language: "It is useful to do this ", "Groups typically do that".  Or perhaps the good old imperative: "Best practice: Use IANA registries."

I'd suggest to either steer clear of strong normative language, or clarify that the status of the document is actually meant to be normative.

Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)

On 2011-12-07, at 06:27 +0100, Larry Masinter wrote:

> I wouldn't mind using call time for even an informal discussion of the attached...
> For my (way overdue) action-531.
> <draft-registries.txt>
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 09:59:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:41 UTC