Saturday, 31 December 2011
Friday, 30 December 2011
Thursday, 29 December 2011
Wednesday, 28 December 2011
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
- Re: URGENT: ACTION-627: Should we review publishing and linking draft at the F2F?
 - Re: URGENT: ACTION-627: Should we review publishing and linking draft at the F2F?
 - publishing and linking draft
 - RE: Persistent references
 
Monday, 26 December 2011
- URGENT: ACTION-627: Should we review publishing and linking draft at the F2F?
 - Re: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 
Saturday, 24 December 2011
Friday, 23 December 2011
- Re: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - RE: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - Draft Minutes for the TAG teleconference of 22 December 2012
 - Product page for Persistence of Identifiers
 
Thursday, 22 December 2011
- Re: HTML/XML TF Report republished
 - Fwd: HTML/XML TF Report republished
 - Re: The CA system is spectacularly broken - can the TAG help?
 - ACTION-641: Find the TAG's old list of issues/concerns relating to HTML5
 - Heads up: RDFa 1.1 headed into Last Call in January 2012
 - Re: Revised MIME and Web product page
 
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
- New TAG Finding: Identifying Application State
 - Revised MIME and Web product page
 - Re: evolution, mime, registration document posted
 - RE: evolution, mime, registration document posted
 - Re: RDFa media type fragment interpretation (TAG-ACTION-509)
 - RDFa media type fragment interpretation (TAG-ACTION-509)
 - Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 22 December 2012
 - Re: evolution, mime, registration document posted
 - Re: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - Re: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
- Re: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - Re: Fwd: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - Re: The CA system is spectacularly broken - can the TAG help?
 - Re: Fwd: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - Re: Fwd: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - TAG telcon of 2011-12-15 draft minutes
 - Re: The CA system is spectacularly broken - can the TAG help?
 - Re: The CA system is spectacularly broken - can the TAG help?
 - Re: The CA system is spectacularly broken - can the TAG help?
 - Re: Fwd: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - evolution, mime, registration document posted
 
Monday, 19 December 2011
- Re: The CA system is spectacularly broken - can the TAG help?
 - The CA system is spectacularly broken - can the TAG help?
 - Fwd: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
 - issue-57 baseline draft and draft of call for change proposals
 
Saturday, 17 December 2011
Friday, 16 December 2011
Thursday, 15 December 2011
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
- Re: Does the NY Times Paywall Misuse HTTP GET?
 - Re: Please review preliminary list of sessions for TAG January F2F
 - Re: Does the NY Times Paywall Misuse HTTP GET?
 - Re: Does the NY Times Paywall Misuse HTTP GET?
 - Re: Opera reparses as HTML when XML parse fails
 - Re: Does the NY Times Paywall Misuse HTTP GET?
 - Re: Does the NY Times Paywall Misuse HTTP GET?
 - Re: Does the NY Times Paywall Misuse HTTP GET?
 - Opera reparses as HTML when XML parse fails
 - Does the NY Times Paywall Misuse HTTP GET?
 - Please review preliminary list of sessions for TAG January F2F
 
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
- Re: Roadmap on extensibility, registries, MIME (and MIME and the web Product Page)
 - Roadmap on extensibility, registries, MIME (and MIME and the web Product Page)
 - Re: Draft Minutes of 8 Dec 2011 Teleconference
 
Saturday, 10 December 2011
Monday, 12 December 2011
Sunday, 11 December 2011
Friday, 9 December 2011
Thursday, 8 December 2011
- Re: early draft on 'best practices for registries' & Dec 8 call ACTION-531
 - Re: Invitation for Philippe Le Hegaret to join in TAG discussion of HTML.next
 - RE: Invitation for Philippe Le Hegaret to join in TAG discussion of HTML.next
 - Re: Invitation for Philippe Le Hegaret to join in TAG discussion of HTML.next
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 - Re: SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 - Re: SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 - Re: SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
- Re: SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 - Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 8 December 2011
 - Invitation for Philippe Le Hegaret to join in TAG discussion of HTML.next
 - Re: early draft on 'best practices for registries' & Dec 8 call ACTION-531
 - Re: SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 - Re: SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 - SPDY as HTTP replacement?
 - RE: Agenda for 1 Dec. 2011 TAG call looks thin - call may be cancelled
 - RE: early draft on 'best practices for registries' & Dec 8 call ACTION-531
 - Re: early draft on 'best practices for registries' & Dec 8 call ACTION-531
 - Re: Agenda for 1 Dec. 2011 TAG call looks thin - call may be cancelled
 - early draft on 'best practices for registries' & Dec 8 call ACTION-531
 - Agenda for 1 Dec. 2011 TAG call looks thin - call may be cancelled
 
Monday, 5 December 2011
- Re: Discussion points on HTTP "evolutions" [ACTION-618]
 - Discussion points on HTTP "evolutions" [ACTION-618]
 - Draft minutes of 1 Dec 2011 teleconference
 - Re: ACTION-625: Followup discussion of httpRange-14 options
 - ACTION-625: Followup discussion of httpRange-14 options
 
Saturday, 3 December 2011
- ACM Queue Article on Buffer Bloat
 - Firefox 11 to Support SPDY (maybe)
 - Re: URL/URI/IRI resolution in HTML5/RDF/RDFa
 
Friday, 2 December 2011
- Re: URL/URI/IRI resolution in HTML5/RDF/RDFa
 - Re: ACTION-509
 - Re: ACTION-509
 - Re: ACTION-509
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: ACTION-509
 - Re: ACTION-509
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: URL/URI/IRI resolution in HTML5/RDF/RDFa
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: ACTION-509
 - Re: ACTION-509
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 
Thursday, 1 December 2011
- ACTION-509
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Re: Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Desktop use of favicons for URI holders
 - Domain Names and Persistence workshop: Programme available
 - Re: Possible TAG comment wrt Polyglot -- TAG ACTION-560
 - Re: Possible TAG comment wrt Polyglot -- TAG ACTION-560