Re: FragIds in semantic web (ACTION-543)

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> wrote:
> I'm probably missing something here, but in the context of the preceding
> text, esp. the distinction between cases B and C, this seems to discourage
> the common(?) practice of publishing both HTML and RDF at the same URI,
> selectable by conneg?
>
> (My take has generally been that in such cases hypertext and RDF should
> generally describe the same things, for human- and machine- consumption
> respectively.)

That's been my take as well, and the 303 URIs forwarding to One
Generic Document pattern as documented in the Cool URIs for the
Semantic Web Note [1] gives it the green flag I think.

//Ed

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 13:27:08 UTC