W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2011

Re: FragIds in semantic web (ACTION-543)

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:26:40 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTik15=1a8v5-mPLgeQsOT4Cnd9uEag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni.tennison@googlemail.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> wrote:
> I'm probably missing something here, but in the context of the preceding
> text, esp. the distinction between cases B and C, this seems to discourage
> the common(?) practice of publishing both HTML and RDF at the same URI,
> selectable by conneg?
>
> (My take has generally been that in such cases hypertext and RDF should
> generally describe the same things, for human- and machine- consumption
> respectively.)

That's been my take as well, and the 303 URIs forwarding to One
Generic Document pattern as documented in the Cool URIs for the
Semantic Web Note [1] gives it the green flag I think.

//Ed

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 13:27:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:38 UTC