W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [Moderator Action] Re: author-only view of HTML5 and ACTION-190

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:57:57 -0400
Message-ID: <4DAB0E05.2030009@arcanedomain.com>
To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
That's great, thank you.  Assuming the commitment to publish this as a part 
of the Rec is a formal one on behalf of the HTML working group, as I assume 
it is, then the TAG's concern is indeed resolved, and I thank you very much 
for both the work you've done, and for the careful response.

Paul Cotton wrote (earlier):

> I believe the ACTION-190 was closed when this document was published in January.  See:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html-markup-20110113/

That's what misled me. Obviously it's up to the HTML WG to decide how to 
track its own action resolutions, but I note that the title of the issue is 
indeed "Fix pubrules problems with "author-only" view of the HTML5 
specification", so I wonder whether it might be appropriate to note that it 
is indeed the publication of 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/author/ that should be 
associated with closing the action, as opposed to 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html-markup-20110113/?

Thank you.

Noah

On 4/17/2011 3:16 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> Noah Mendelsohn<nrm@arcanedomain.com>, 2011-04-16 18:44 +0000:
>
>> Actually no, this does not resolve the concern. The document you reference
>> above is indeed of interest to the TAG too, and we are glad that it is being
>> published. but it is not the one in question here I'm fairly sure. That is
>> [1], which is the author view of the main spec. That was the one that Mike
>> had told us in Lyon he had left out of the then recently published package
>> due to the work involved in pubrules compliance, and you (Paul) and I agreed
>> that the TAG's concern would be resolved if it were put onto the rec track.
>> I think it's clear from your 4 Nov 2010 message, quoted in part in the
>> thread below, that it's [1] that's in question here. Can you confirm that it
>> too is going into the Rec. packages? Thank you.
>
> It is now being published along with full spec each time we produce a new
> working draft of that, and will continue to be going forward. The only time
> the author view was not published along with the spec was the 19 October 2010
> round of publications. But after that we did two more publication rounds,
> and the author view was included in both:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/author/
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110405/author/
>
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2011 15:58:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:10 UTC