Re: Memo on persistent reference - TAG please read before F2F discussion

I found two statements in the draft that were just plain wrong, and
one or two places that were so confusing they needed a few extra
words. I have updated the document in place but have marked the
changes clearly.


On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jonathan Rees <> wrote:
> ISSUE-50
> ACTION-444

Received on Saturday, 16 October 2010 01:43:49 UTC