Re: Memo on persistent reference - TAG please read before F2F discussion

I found two statements in the draft that were just plain wrong, and
one or two places that were so confusing they needed a few extra
words. I have updated the document in place but have marked the
changes clearly.

Jonathan

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/persistent-reference/
>
>
> ISSUE-50
> ACTION-444

Received on Saturday, 16 October 2010 01:43:49 UTC