- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:06:32 -0700
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: John Kemp <john@jkemp.net>, "Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group" <Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com>, "jar@creativecommons.org" <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Yes, I agree: But, a picky point, if you add a fragId to a URL is it the same URL? I think we need to argue that it is. I'm not sure what you mean by 'server parts'. This is a good point to make and goes with your earlier comment about 'only some states need to be saved in a replicable manner. I'm happy to add this to the next version on the Saving Client State writeup. All the best, Ashok On 10/14/2010 2:46 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > I agree about being explicit... > > I think the design choice between using cookies and using URI annotations > (query parameters or fragment identifiers or path or even server parts > of the identifier) should be, in the best designs, that the URI annotations > identify those elements of the application state that make sense to > save and restore at a later time, or to communicate to a third party. > > Does that make sense? > > Larry > -- > http://larry.masinter.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ashok malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:38 PM > To: Larry Masinter > Cc: John Kemp; Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group; jar@creativecommons.org; www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: ACTION-434: Some notes on organizing discussion on WebApps architecture > > Larry wrote: > > "Well, I wonder if we might introduce another step between > "resource" and "representation" which is "application resource > in identified state", so that the representation isn't a > representation of the resource, but a representation of the > resource in that state." > > Perhaps! But how is the state indicated? Either the URL changes or there is some other > information such as cookies. We need to be explicit about this. > > > All the best, Ashok > > On 10/14/2010 2:11 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: >> Well, I wonder if we might introduce another step between >> "resource" and "representation" which is "application resource >> in identified state", so that the representation isn't a >> representation of the resource, but a representation of the >> resource in that state.
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 23:09:31 UTC