- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:34:57 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
On 08.10.2010 15:51, Yves Lafon wrote: > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Yves Lafon wrote: > >> My position on this is that: >> * Fragments in redirects have a real value and are already used. >> * Fragment recombination can be hard and impossible in the general case >> * We need to define a good story for applying a fragment to a >> redirected URI >> with a different fragment. > > And the proposal is: > << When retrieving a resource A leads to a redirect to an URI B > containing a fragment, any existing fragment on A MUST be dropped in > favor of B's Fragment >> > > Original URI: A#Frag1 > -> GET A > -> 3xx Location: B#frag2 > Final URI -> B#frag2 We probably should mention that this is what UAs actually *do*, and have been doing for a long time (<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/43>). Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 16:35:41 UTC