W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2010

Re: ACTION-443 Chase down what specs say regarding looking up fragid in 2nd representation if not found in 1st representation

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:43:18 +0100
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <062A9C42-4E81-478D-A380-9E03A43544D9@la-grange.net>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>

Le 12 juil. 2010 à 20:22, Jonathan Rees a écrit :
> The only generic primary documentation I found that might apply to the
> interaction between conneg and fragids was what is found in RFC 3986
> section 3.5,

Not related directly to content negotiation (conneg) but 
there is another draft which never made it as a RFC 
"Handling of fragment identifiers in redirected URLs"

We mentioned this draft in CUAP - http://www.w3.org/TR/cuap#cp-fragment

Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 07:43:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:34 UTC