- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:57:11 -0500
- To: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Le 17 déc. 2010 à 12:04, Rotan Hanrahan a écrit : > It is quite clear from this example that it is an abuse of an image in which ownership/copyright is held by someone else. It depends on the country. In France there are two different rights. * droit patrimonial (money, revenues - cease 70 years after death of the author), * droit moral (respect of the idea - never cease) Maybe it's what you wanted to say (then ignore). On the point of… > In the absence of any protection mechanism, making the resource representation available via the URI is akin to open publication. Subsequent use of such published resource representations is out of scope for the Web architecture. I think I agree here. What is legal or not legal depends often on the society, its background and evolutions. To that point and slightly on the edge with regards to the scope of this discussion. Copyright in a Networked World http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6560 -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 20:58:05 UTC