Re: TAG resolution on redirection with fragment identifiers

On 12/5/2010 7:46 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> We could extend that text like that:
> -- snip --
>        Note: This specification does not define precedence rules for the
>        case where the original URI, as navigated to by the user agent,
>        and the Location header field value both contain fragment
>        identifiers.  Thus be aware that including fragment identifiers
>        might inconvenience anyone relying on the semantics of the
>        original URI's fragment identifier.
> -- snip --
> So this is just a clarification of the current spec's position. Is the WG
> ok with sticking with this position (not specifying the rule)?

TAG members, what do you think?  It would be nice to agree this without 
further telcon time if possible.  Thank you.


Received on Sunday, 5 December 2010 16:03:14 UTC