Larry Masinter wrote: > > > I thought I made some progress on uncovering the justification for > content-type sniffing application/postscript, at least for Mac Safari > users there is a postscript viewer that does something more useful with > sniffed postscript (labeled as text/plain) than it would with text/plain > itself or application/octet-stream. > > > > The conversation is a little hard to wade through, but suggested reading > for other nuggets: > > > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20090927 > ... Related to this: I'd be interested to hear from people looking just at the words in HTML5 whether they think content type sniffing is required or not. BR, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 09:34:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:30 UTC