Re: Alternative dereference behavior

On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 13:00 -0400, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> This message is pursuant to ACTION-312 which I took on at the F2F.
> Roughly speaking, the question is: Does the canon say that the Web is
> the authority for http: URI "dereference" (GET), or does it leave open the
> possibility of conforming agents using mechanisms that give answers
> at variance with what the Web would give?

> Summary:
>   . General advice (AWWW, IAB TC) is that if you "split the web" by making URIs
>     non-global you are doing something really tragic.  A change
>     in the rules for dereference would theoretically be OK, as long as everyone
>     made the change in step (ha!).

Exactly. That seems like a "yes" answer to the question above,
inasmuch as an authority is something that helps you avoid something
really tragic.

I don't see any contradiction with my reading of webarch;
maybe the description of the action should change or something?

"Find a path thru the specs that I think contradicts Dan's reading of

Dan Connolly, W3C
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 20:04:55 UTC