- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:33:32 +0000
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cotton writes:
>> All of the above formulations assume a definition of
>> 'implementation-dependent' along the following lines:
>
>> If a choice is described as 'implementation-dependent', then
>> conformant implementations must document which choice they make.
>
> Editorial comment:
>
> Given that all the formulations actually use the phrase "implementation-defined" and not "implementation-dependent", I believe the above text should replace "implementation-dependent" with "implementation-defined".
Absolutely, apologies for fumble-finger.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFK6ae8kjnJixAXWBoRAtqvAJ9AGXSmIPdG169iVKXJ/M3/BesTcgCfVV2C
M0jSVbLSEH7hjlAlgiyHOYg=
=0peo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 14:34:07 UTC