- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:18:06 -0400
- To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>, www-tag@w3.org
I'm sorry, isn't this exactly what the POWDER architecture is for? Have you looked at it? This is a technical list and probably not the best place to talk about regulation. Jonathan On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> wrote: > I have no doubt RDF is useful for the web. W3C is actually doing a > great job in developing technologies, which helps the web and all of > us. > > I am actually looking for a subscription based service from ISPs, > where I should be able to opt for say: > 1) The present web > 2) Non adult web > 3) Adult web > > I am not sure, if anybody else feels such a need. I also feel, it's > challanging to separate web content on the basis of above criteria. > Filtering binary images is challanging, I guess. > > I think, if we achive such a separation of content, and provide these > kinds of subsriptions to users, web could truly become a media like a > newspaper or television. At present, there seems to be no regulatory > structure and enforcement of content on the web.
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 18:18:47 UTC