Re: lightly edited TAG input to DAP WG per 8 Oct and tell Noah

On Sunday 2009-11-29 17:19 -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
> The
> TAG, therefore, urges WGs working in these areas to include in their
> architecture the ability to use policy information to control access
> to user data, retention of user data and related concerns. Addressing
> these concerns should be a requirement, although the details of how
> they are addressed may vary by application.

The first of the sentences quoted above makes it sound like the TAG
might be taking a position disagreeing with the arguments in the
following messages, against (at least some definitions of) policy
mechanisms.  Might it be worth being clearer whether this message is
taking sides in that debate?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0782.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0787.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0791.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0834.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0835.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0836.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0852.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0856.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0857.html

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/

Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 02:48:07 UTC