Re: link relationship registries at IANA and whatwg.org RE: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62

Thanks, Paul. Will talk to you soon.

Cheers,


On 20/11/2009, at 8:14 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:

> Please note that I volunteered to draft a proposal for the HTML WG Issue-27.  See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Nov/0508.html
> 
>> I'm following up with Mike and PLH.
> 
> Dan, please include me in this conversation.
> 
>> I had a discussion with Hixie at the TP about the registry, and I think we have a viable way forward.
> 
> Mark, I will get in touch with you when I get back from vacation on Dec 7 to figure out how to coordinate on this item.
> 
>> Saying that proposals are demanded on a deadline now is a bit rich.
> 
> Please note the text in the Call for Proposal:
> 
>  "If no Change Proposals are written by the WG meeting on December 17, this issue will be closed without prejudice."
> 
> The HTML WG chairs are attempting to help the WG get into Last Call.  To do this we need to clean out our issues list and for issues that are as old as Issue-27 giving a one month notice seems fair to us.  Please note the "without prejudice" wording that means if someone wanted to bring up this issue again during Last Call we would certainly consider this as a valid action. 
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nottingham
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:42 PM
> To: Dan Connolly
> Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com; www-tag@w3.org; Philippe Le Hegaret; Michael(tm) Smith
> Subject: Re: link relationship registries at IANA and whatwg.org RE: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62
> 
> I had a discussion with Hixie at the TP about the registry, and I think we have a viable way forward. I'm currently documenting what was discussed, and should have a draft out shortly (although I'm currently working on about five major efforts, including an implementation of a brand-new protocol).
> 
> Regarding the "dead man switch" - Proclaiming ultimatums doesn't seem productive. I've attempted to engage with the HTML5 WG several times through their chairs (albeit a different set), and never got an answer. Saying that proposals are demanded on a deadline now is a bit rich.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> On 20/11/2009, at 7:37 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
>> Thanks... this list of pointers with status info is quite timely.
>> 
>> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 15:24 -0700, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
>>> - Web Linking (Common registry and the HTTP Link header):
>>> 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06
>>> 
>>> IETF Last-Call ended. A revision with registry clarifications is coming shortly.
>> 
>> Speaking of the IETF/IANA registry, the HTML 5 spec plans
>> a whatwg registry of link relationships in the HTML 5 spec.
>> The WG as a whole has an open issue around that, but the
>> chairs just sent a solicitation for proposals with a
>> 17 Dec dead-man switch.
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Nov/0501.html
>> 
>> I hope we can avoid two registries. I'm following up with
>> Mike and PLH.
>> 
>> p.s. tracker, this is relevant to ACTION-281 on tracking
>> the link header draft.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 21:22:20 UTC